Loan to Value information
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2002 3:33 pm
It has been brought to my attention that anxious insureds and pushy lenders are increasingly seeking to secure MH insurance greatly in excess of the value of the actual home due to opposing methods of valuation.
In this lending market, lenders are eager to lend to the fullest extent, and obviously are taking into consideration the value of the land under a mobil home for a quasi-global mortgage in instances when a MH buyer either owns or is buying the land under which the MH sits. In opposition to this, MH insurance covers only the manufactured home (generally taking into consideration age and depreciation), detached out-buildings, and personal property. No land value is computed into this valuation.
The moral risk associated with greatly over-insuring due to inclusion of land values is obviously something insurers are attempting to avoid. Yet, lenders continue to lend based on total values they compute, and insurance companies become obliged for at least the cancellation notice period to endorse to values agents with binding authority submit.
The sad outcome is ultimately no insurer will insure to the value requested by the lending institution, and insureds are in breach of contract for not obtaining sufficient insurance for a loan.
Are you aware of any articles that address this issue, and is the MH insurance industry addressing this issue through any education and publishing means?
In this lending market, lenders are eager to lend to the fullest extent, and obviously are taking into consideration the value of the land under a mobil home for a quasi-global mortgage in instances when a MH buyer either owns or is buying the land under which the MH sits. In opposition to this, MH insurance covers only the manufactured home (generally taking into consideration age and depreciation), detached out-buildings, and personal property. No land value is computed into this valuation.
The moral risk associated with greatly over-insuring due to inclusion of land values is obviously something insurers are attempting to avoid. Yet, lenders continue to lend based on total values they compute, and insurance companies become obliged for at least the cancellation notice period to endorse to values agents with binding authority submit.
The sad outcome is ultimately no insurer will insure to the value requested by the lending institution, and insureds are in breach of contract for not obtaining sufficient insurance for a loan.
Are you aware of any articles that address this issue, and is the MH insurance industry addressing this issue through any education and publishing means?