Who bears cost of releveling on a rented lot? & other issues
Posted: Tue Apr 19, 2011 3:21 pm
I began to notice that recently the door to my son's bedroom & his closets are not closing properly. I suspected that it might be a leveling issue, so I wrote a letter to the park management. She sent me a response advising that she would prepare a "work ticket" and someone would come check it out. A man did come take a look at it a few days later, without so much as a courtesy call first. I showed him where the problem was and he proceeded to check the level throughout the home. My son's room is the only room that is not level and it sits at the front right corner. Then he went under the house and said it looked good underneath, relatively dry, given all the rain we've had here in Maryland these past several weeks.
This home sits atop a pretty steep hill and a couple of years ago I noticed a problem with a trench beginning along the right side of the house at about the point that it starts to decline and called management about that issue. The owner himself came by to take a look at it and said he'd have it taken care of within a day or two at the most. At first he tried to say it was because I needed to clean the gutters. Much to his surprise that was not the issue at all. His crew came by the next day and ended up installing no less than 4 very long French drains to help move the water down the hill and away from the foundation. The cost of this work was at his expense and I was billed nothing. Mind you I don't think I should have been anyway as I don't own the property, only the home that has been sitting on in since 1983 (new). My home didn't cause that issue and certainly hasn't caused the current settling issue either, but they sent me an estimate of about $350 to relevel the house, barring any unforeseen circumstances.
I bought this home in Sept. 2007 and it is my responsiblity to maintain it to not only to their standards but mine as well. Since I don't own the property it sits on why should I have to pay for the releveling that was caused by the land and not my home? Although, it is not a huge expense so far, it would be hard for me as I am disabled and living on a limited income. But, it needs to be done before it causes damage to my home.
As an aside, I find the owner to be an arrogant, greedy jerk. Last year a 30' tall tree that sat right in front of my home was felled by a storm. Thankfully it didn't hit my home. His crew came by within a couple of days to cut it up and remove the tree leaving a 3' high stump, which I was told would be removed within a few days after they finished with the more pressing fallen tree issues. That was never done. I've called, I've written and all to no avail. Last Spring when the owner came by for the annual inspection, I asked him directly about removing the stump. He told me not to worry about it as it was "his" property not mine. Yep, he did. So not only have I lost the beauty of that blossoming tree, but the added benefit of keeping the house cooler and shaded in the summer. Now I have a hideous 3' high stump in my front yard, with branches forming out from it, and shoots starting up from the roots that run along the yard as well. I could care less what happens to his property at this point and will now only do what most around here do to their lawns, NOTHING, but mow whatever grows. I turned this barren, crabgrass ridden piece of HIS property into a healthy, lush lawn and surrounded it with flowers that bloom year round and at considerable expense to me. None of that phased him at all. As hard is it would be on me physically to have to move again so soon, and certainly not what I planned to do when I bought this home, the added stress of maintaining it for someone else to profit from is offensive to me. So as soon as I can sell it (even at a loss) that will be done.
I apologize for the rambling, just venting my frustrations with this whole situation. So who do you think should bear the expense of the releveling?
Many thanks.
This home sits atop a pretty steep hill and a couple of years ago I noticed a problem with a trench beginning along the right side of the house at about the point that it starts to decline and called management about that issue. The owner himself came by to take a look at it and said he'd have it taken care of within a day or two at the most. At first he tried to say it was because I needed to clean the gutters. Much to his surprise that was not the issue at all. His crew came by the next day and ended up installing no less than 4 very long French drains to help move the water down the hill and away from the foundation. The cost of this work was at his expense and I was billed nothing. Mind you I don't think I should have been anyway as I don't own the property, only the home that has been sitting on in since 1983 (new). My home didn't cause that issue and certainly hasn't caused the current settling issue either, but they sent me an estimate of about $350 to relevel the house, barring any unforeseen circumstances.
I bought this home in Sept. 2007 and it is my responsiblity to maintain it to not only to their standards but mine as well. Since I don't own the property it sits on why should I have to pay for the releveling that was caused by the land and not my home? Although, it is not a huge expense so far, it would be hard for me as I am disabled and living on a limited income. But, it needs to be done before it causes damage to my home.
As an aside, I find the owner to be an arrogant, greedy jerk. Last year a 30' tall tree that sat right in front of my home was felled by a storm. Thankfully it didn't hit my home. His crew came by within a couple of days to cut it up and remove the tree leaving a 3' high stump, which I was told would be removed within a few days after they finished with the more pressing fallen tree issues. That was never done. I've called, I've written and all to no avail. Last Spring when the owner came by for the annual inspection, I asked him directly about removing the stump. He told me not to worry about it as it was "his" property not mine. Yep, he did. So not only have I lost the beauty of that blossoming tree, but the added benefit of keeping the house cooler and shaded in the summer. Now I have a hideous 3' high stump in my front yard, with branches forming out from it, and shoots starting up from the roots that run along the yard as well. I could care less what happens to his property at this point and will now only do what most around here do to their lawns, NOTHING, but mow whatever grows. I turned this barren, crabgrass ridden piece of HIS property into a healthy, lush lawn and surrounded it with flowers that bloom year round and at considerable expense to me. None of that phased him at all. As hard is it would be on me physically to have to move again so soon, and certainly not what I planned to do when I bought this home, the added stress of maintaining it for someone else to profit from is offensive to me. So as soon as I can sell it (even at a loss) that will be done.
I apologize for the rambling, just venting my frustrations with this whole situation. So who do you think should bear the expense of the releveling?
Many thanks.