Cities restrictions on Manufactured Housing
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2004 1:21 pm
I'm having a problem in the city of Midlothian, Texas. In order to explain this properly I will have to give a little history.
About 12 years ago I purchased 16 acres outside of the city of Midlothian and put a manufactured home on it and had no problem. About 8 years ago the city annexed my property and began charging me taxes without providing me with any of the services that state law requires after a set period of time. I believe the annexing city has 4 years to provide services. My problem began when my neighbor and friend decided to sell his property next to mine and offered me a good deal on the 2 piece manufactured home that he had. Mine was a single and hadn't held up to well and I thought I might up grade and replace. So I had the larger home moved onto my property and the city took note of this and tried to stop the move before the contractor I had hired got 2nd piece in place. After meeting with city officials I was able to convince them to let me finish the move so that I would not sustain weather damage while the home was in halves. So now I have 2 manufactured homes on my property and the city is requiring that I go before the zoning board and ask for a variance on the non-conformant housing ordinance that they are citing me with. This is despite my complaints that I must be allowed to up grade by replacement and I have grandfather rights. The city has taken the position that I can continue living in the home that needs to be replaced, but I cannot change anything without being within the city's ordinances.
Beside the fact that I believe that the city is in the wrong as far as the grandfather rights go I read an article entitled "Dallas moves to block prefab homes", in the Dallas Morning News dated 11-12-4 by Emily Ramshaw. That indicated that cities in Texas where limited a great deal in what they could do in regaurd to limiting manufactured housing and the city of Dallas found that the only limits it could place on said homes was in the way of deed restrictions on land that the city had sold below fair market value and there was nothing it could do within state law in regaurd to private property.
What are your thought on this and any help you could lend would be greatly appretiated.
James B. Wade
[email protected]
About 12 years ago I purchased 16 acres outside of the city of Midlothian and put a manufactured home on it and had no problem. About 8 years ago the city annexed my property and began charging me taxes without providing me with any of the services that state law requires after a set period of time. I believe the annexing city has 4 years to provide services. My problem began when my neighbor and friend decided to sell his property next to mine and offered me a good deal on the 2 piece manufactured home that he had. Mine was a single and hadn't held up to well and I thought I might up grade and replace. So I had the larger home moved onto my property and the city took note of this and tried to stop the move before the contractor I had hired got 2nd piece in place. After meeting with city officials I was able to convince them to let me finish the move so that I would not sustain weather damage while the home was in halves. So now I have 2 manufactured homes on my property and the city is requiring that I go before the zoning board and ask for a variance on the non-conformant housing ordinance that they are citing me with. This is despite my complaints that I must be allowed to up grade by replacement and I have grandfather rights. The city has taken the position that I can continue living in the home that needs to be replaced, but I cannot change anything without being within the city's ordinances.
Beside the fact that I believe that the city is in the wrong as far as the grandfather rights go I read an article entitled "Dallas moves to block prefab homes", in the Dallas Morning News dated 11-12-4 by Emily Ramshaw. That indicated that cities in Texas where limited a great deal in what they could do in regaurd to limiting manufactured housing and the city of Dallas found that the only limits it could place on said homes was in the way of deed restrictions on land that the city had sold below fair market value and there was nothing it could do within state law in regaurd to private property.
What are your thought on this and any help you could lend would be greatly appretiated.
James B. Wade
[email protected]